CRMJ 300 Week 4 Complete Discussions DeVry
Just Click on Below Link To
Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2RuZyJr
CRMJ 300 Week 4 Complete Discussions DeVry
CRMJ
300 Week 4 Discussions
CRMJ 300 WEEK 4 A SUPREME COURT DIALOGUE
In advance of participating in this discussion, review
the Supreme Court tutorial found at the bottom of the Week 4: Lesson page. On
January 24, 2002, the Olympic torch relay was to run in front of a high school
in Juneau, Alaska. School was dismissed early that day so that students could
watch the relay pass in front of the school. One student, whose last name is
Frederick, arrived late that day just in time to watch the Olympic torch pass
in front of the school. He brought with him a very large banner that he
displayed as the torch passed in front of the school. The banner read “BONG
HITS 4 JESUS.” (Frederick claimed that he saw this on a sticker once and
thought it was funny.) Frederick was immediately suspended from school by the
principal, Mrs. Morse, for violating the school’s drug policy. Frederick then
filed a lawsuit claiming that his freedom of speech was violated. This case has
now been appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, and the court needs to
decide if the school’s rights or the rights of the student should be protected
by the law.
You are now the judge! Listen to actual oral arguments before the Supreme Court, and ask questions along with the Justices. The assignment, after you watch the case proceedings, is to write a decision in the case that is at least a paragraph in length. What are the arguments in the case — should Frederick have been suspended? When does a school have the right to limit freedom of speech? Explain your reasoning. Then be sure to provide a substantive comment on the reasoning that a classmate uses to arrive at a decision.
You are now the judge! Listen to actual oral arguments before the Supreme Court, and ask questions along with the Justices. The assignment, after you watch the case proceedings, is to write a decision in the case that is at least a paragraph in length. What are the arguments in the case — should Frederick have been suspended? When does a school have the right to limit freedom of speech? Explain your reasoning. Then be sure to provide a substantive comment on the reasoning that a classmate uses to arrive at a decision.
CRMJ 300 WEEK 4 ROLE OF THE DEFENSE
Perhaps every attorney who works as criminal
defense counsel has heard this question: “I don’t know how an attorney can
represent a pedophile” (or rapist, terrorist, and so forth). What kind of
answer could you come up with? What principle or principle(s) would you cite to
in support of your answer? Do you accept or reject a classmates’ response; why
or why not?
Comments
Post a Comment