CRMJ 425 Week 5 Homework And Self Quiz


Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2yH8Hre

CRMJ 425 Week 5 Homework And Self Quiz

CRMJ 425 Ethics And Criminal Justice

CRMJ 425 Week 5

CRMJ 425 WEEK 5 HOMEWORK
Vocabulary Exercise & Self-Quiz
Each subject has its own vocabulary; ethics is no exception. To help you better understand this course and perhaps to have some fun, please try this “exercise” which has key terms for Week 5 – see how well you do! Also, there is a “self-quiz.” I encourage you to take this quiz; it will help prepare you for the questions you will find on the Final Exam. These exercises are found in this week’s lesson.
Ethical Dilemma
Complete one of the Ethical Dilemma Situations beginning on page 245 of your text, and click Ethical Dilemma Instructions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for instructions on how to solve this dilemma. You may choose to write about any one of the Ethical Dilemmas that interests you.
Don’t forget to submit your assignment.
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer- cise using the following format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s) that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law enforcement officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to seek justice (same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the officer thought the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and act-utilitarianism). One of the principles of due process and our system of advocacy is that the defense attorney has a right of access to exculpatory information – the prosecutor is both legally and ethically bound to provide such information to the defense. The police officer, as a participant in the justice process, has a complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have questions ask your instructor.




Comments

Popular Posts