ENG 105 Week 2 Discussions and Assignment GCU
Just Click on Below Link To
Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2RupB3f
ENG 105 Topic 2 DQ 1
In 150-200 words, please analyze the document’s purpose and
audience. Who, for example, is the CDC’s audience? What are the CDC’s beliefs
about ADHD, and how does the CDC’s Web page relate itself to those beliefs? Why
would the federal government post a Web page about ADHD? What role does the
general public expect the government to play regarding disorders such as ADHD?
During the week, go back and read some of your classmates’
posts. Do you agree with their views?
ENG 105 Topic 2 DQ 2
Review the CDC website and answer at least three of
the questions below:
1.
Who is the writer?
2.
What is the writer’s purpose?
3.
Who is the intended audience?
4.
What is the broader cultural context that motivated the writing
of the article?
5.
How does the writer establish ethos?
6.
Does the writer appeal to logos (logic)?
7.
Does the writer appeal to pathos (emotions)?
8.
Do you feel that the website is effective? Why or why not?
Use these questions to guide the content of your rhetorical
analysis.
During the week, review your classmates’ posts. What are some
similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses?
ENG 105 Topic 2 First Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis of a Public
Document
Details:
Refer to the “First Draft Rhetorical Analysis of a Public
Document” resource for instructions on completing this assignment.
ENG105_First
DraftRhetoricalAnalysisofPublicDocAssignment.docxENG105_T2Rubric.RhetoricalAnalysis.doc
ENG 105 Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Forum
Please follow these steps:
1.
Begin by posting your Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft by the
deadline to TWO places: to the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis
Peer Review Forum AND to the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis
Rough Draft assignment box.
2.
Next, review the draft of the person who posted his/her
response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If
your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted. Then, complete
the “Peer Review Rhetorical Analysis Worksheet” (see attachment in Assignment
dropbox). Review the “Rubric Peer Review” media piece for information on
effective peer reviews.
3.
You will then need to post your completed Peer Review Worksheet
to TWO places: to the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review
Forum for your peer to view, as well as to the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis
Peer Review assignment box, so the instructor can grade your work.
4.
Attach the file with your completed Peer Review Worksheet to the
Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Forum as a “reply” to the initial post of your
peer’s first draft.
5.
Please note that to participate in the peer review process you
must post your essay by 11:59 pm (AZ time) on Wednesday of Module 2.
If you do not submit the Rough Draft or Peer Review Worksheet to
both places or if you review the wrong person, you may not receive full credit
for this assignment.
ENG 105 Topic 2 Peer Review of a Classmate’s First Draft of a
Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document
Details:
Please follow these steps:
1.
Begin by posting your Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft by the
deadline to TWO places: to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis
Peer Review Forum AND to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Rough
Draft assignment box.
2.
Review the media piece: “Peer Review Using Rubrics” located in
the Course Material folder for information on effective peer reviews.
3.
Next, review the draft of the person who posted his/her
response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If
your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted. Then, complete
the “Peer Review Rhetorical Analysis Worksheet” (see attachment).
4.
You will then need to post your completed Peer Review Worksheet
to TWO places: to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review
Forum for your peer to view, as well as to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer
Review assignment box, so the instructor can grade your work.
5.
Attach the file with your completed Peer Review Worksheet to the
Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Forum as a “reply” to the initial post of your
peer’s first draft.
6.
Please note that to participate in the peer review process you
must post your essay by 11:59 pm (AZ time) on Wednesday of Topic 2.
If you do not submit the Rough Draft or Peer Review Worksheet to
both places or if you review the wrong person, you may not receive full credit
for this assignment.
Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Worksheet Revised .docx
Comments
Post a Comment