Collaborate with your team, using Cisco Spark, email,
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2QfnGTW
ETHC
445 Week 2 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 2 ETHICAL DILEMMA ANALYSIS
Collaborate
with your team, using Cisco Spark, email, phone meetings, or any collaboration
tool you find useful or prefer. In your collaboration, consider the ethical
dilemmas below and select 1 in which to conduct a deep drill.
Ethical
Dilemma 1: A
newspaper columnist signs a contract with a newspaper chain. Several months
later, she is offered a position with another newspaper chain, offering a
higher salary. Because she would prefer making more money, she notifies the
first chain that she is breaking her contract. The courts will decide the
legality of her action, but what of the morality? Did the columnist behave
ethically?
Ethical
Dilemma 2: An
airline pilot receives his regular medical checkup. The doctor discovers that
he has developed a heart murmur. The pilot only has a month to go before he is
eligible for retirement. The doctor knows this and wonders whether, under these
unusual circumstances, she is justified in withholding information from the
company regarding the pilot’s condition.
Ethical
Dilemma 3: An
office worker has had a record of frequent absence. He has used all his
vacation and sick-leave days, and has frequently requested additional leave
without pay. His supervisor and co-workers have expressed great frustration
because his absenteeism has caused bottlenecks in paperwork, created low morale
in the office, and required others to do his work in addition to their own.
However, the individual believes he is entitled to take his earned time and
additional time off without pay. Is he right?
Ethical
Dilemma 4: Rhonda
enjoys socializing with fellow employees at work, but their discussions usually
consist of gossiping about other people, including several of her friends. At
first, Rhonda feels uncomfortable talking in this way about people she is close
to; but then she decides it does no real harm, and she feels no remorse for
joining in.
In
conjunction with the readings, and within your teams, decide which ethical
dilemma you believe is most problematic and why. In your teams, discuss the
ideas of “good vs. evil,” “wrong vs. right,” and “ought/should be vs. what is.”
Form the readings, discuss the ways in which Augustine and Aquinas would have
solved the problem based on lecture and course reading material. In what ways
do Augustine and Aquinas differ and why?
You
may wish to meet throughout the week to share ideas. Create a report of your
findings as individuals and as a team. The report should be approximately 2
pages accompanied by a 2-minute oral presentation, using VoiceThread or a
PowerPoint narrated slide show.
Rubric
Ethical
Dilemma Analysis
|
Ethical Dilemma Analysis
|
||||
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomePurpose
The paper
has a clear purpose that begins with a solid introduction/thesis, and compels
the reader forward.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development
The
analysis shows depth of critical thought. Readings, collaborations, and
course materials are leveraged powerfully in support of writer’s evident
effort to understand ethical problems. Good use of theoretical underpinnings
are used.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style
Grammar
refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and
use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage,
e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style refers to
dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows,
describes, and compels the reader’s interest.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides
|
|
15.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
|
|
10.0 pts
|
||
|
Total
Points: 100.0
|
||||
Comments
Post a Comment