Create your own 2-4 paragraph “dilemma.”
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2RDwTSH
ETHC
445 Week 4 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 4 ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP
Using
academic scholarly research, find an article that addresses an ethical dilemma
from the past five years and annotate it thoroughly. What are the key
points to the article? Summarize the dilemma. What are the key
terms of the article? What conflicts or controversies does it
raise? Where can you offer analysis or an original point of view?
Once you have a handle on the article and your reaction to the issues it
raises, use it as a foundation to
- Create your own 2-4 paragraph “dilemma.”
- Apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to
the problem you invent.
- Apply any other method you have
encountered in lecture material and the readings.
- State which method you prefer and why.
- Work with a
partner collaboratively to share and divide this work for optimal results.
Your
paper should be 3 pages. You MUST provide the source of the foundation
dilemma, and thus this paper will require 1 reference using at least 1 correct
in-text citation (indicating quoted or paraphrased material from the article
and where to locate it). Use APA format in citing the source. Refer
to course resources for details and help in achieving APA style.
Work
with a partner to share this assignment collaboratively and create a combined
oral presentation. Consider creating a youtube video, MP3 podcast (if you
have those skills) or a video presentation.
Rubric
Academic
Scholarship
|
Academic Scholarship
|
||||
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeIntroduction
Writer
provides a solid example of academic scholarship, related to a specific
real-world problem. The source is written by a professional ethicist,
scholar, appears in a peer-reviewed journal, and has ample references of its
own.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation Quality
The writer
annotates the source fully, considering the main points, key terms used (with
in-text citation of pages); s/he analyzes content for implications,
consequences, and subtle problems and controversies. S/he establishes points
of agreement/disagreement and gives cause. S/he locates 1 or 2 pithy
quotations that will serve as evidence in his/her analysis. Course material
and team input is leveraged powerfully.
|
|
40.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format,
Quality of Thought
Grammar
refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and
use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage,
e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts)
refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that
shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been
taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly
interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation
|
|
25.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
|
|
20.0 pts
|
||
|
Total
Points: 150.0
|
||||
Comments
Post a Comment