The “You Decide” assignment presents a difficult and painful dilemma
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2Umve5P
ETHC
445 Week 5 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 5 YOU DECIDE
The
“You Decide” assignment presents a difficult and painful dilemma, with you in
an imagined professional role. Go through the You Decide presentation, make the
decision it calls for, meet you’re your team or partner to discuss, and compose
a paper and presentation that explains your decision and your reasoning and
justification for it.
You
are called upon to make a painful medical decision and to explain it both
orally and in writing. Who benefits from what you decided, who gets
denied a needed benefit, and why? You will compose an official memorandum
that will be kept for the record and could potentially be read not only by your
Peer Review Committee, but also by those involved in charitable fundraising,
which supports hospital development, as well as by others with financial
interests in the decision.
You
will see notice that there is time pressure in the simulated situation, so
remember that you would not have the luxury to dawdle in the decision-making
process, and as the decision-maker, you would not have the luxury of consulting
a broad spectrum of advisors. It falls on you and your team or partner to
decide!
Include
in the document and presentation the utilitarian ethical philosophy of John
Stuart Mill (from the lecture and audio for this week) and one other ethical
philosopher of your choosing that we have studied to date, and use both of
those philosophies to bolster your decision. This paper will be at least 2
pages and no more than 3 pages with a 2-3 minute oral presentation on which you
and your team or partner may (ideally and preferably) collaborate. Remember,
both professional written form and potential audience, as well as tone when
writing this sensitive memorandum.
Outside
sources are not required, but if used, must be cited properly.
Rubric
You Decide
|
You Decide
|
||||
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeIntroduction
Writer
summarizes a difficult situation sensitively and offers a compelling purpose
for writing.
|
|
40.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development
Course
material and team or partner input is leveraged powerfully. Theoretical
underpinnings are well understood and used to bring an argument/justification
of choice forward. Both Locke and another philosopher are used.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format,
Quality of Thought
Grammar
refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and
use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage,
e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts)
refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that
shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been
taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly
interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.
|
|
40.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation
|
|
25.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
|
|
20.0 pts
|
||
|
Total
Points: 175.0
|
||||
Comments
Post a Comment