Working in teams, consider the following three problems.
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://bit.ly/2zMD2oF
ETHC
445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry
ETHC 445 Week 3 GREATER GOOD ANALYSIS
Working
in teams, consider the following three problems. In writing a paper about each
problem, identify the consequences of the actions taken, and then determine
whether the actions taken represented a greater good, who would benefit from
the good, and whether the consequences ethically justify the decisions and
actions.
The
Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by
people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from
organizations that have not done business with the City, but might in the
future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer
watches and jewelry.
A
college instructor is pursuing her doctorate in night school. To gain extra
time for her own studies, she gives her students the same lectures, the same
assignments, and the same examinations semester after semester without the
slightest effort to improve them.
Todd
and Edna have been married for three years. They have had serious personal
problems. Edna is a heavy drinker, and Todd cannot keep a job. Also, they have
bickered and fought constantly since their marriage. Deciding that the way to
overcome their problems is to have a child, they stop practicing birth control,
and Edna becomes pregnant.
Using
what you have learned from collaborations, discussions, and readings up to this
week, explore your answers to these ethical dilemmas. How would Locke
have addressed or solved the problem? Explain how his ethics and the answer he
may have given are different from or the same as yours.
Compose
a 2 page paper and oral narration of 2 minutes, discussing all three ethical
dilemmas in depth.
Rubric
Greater Good
Analysis
|
Greater Good Analysis
|
||||
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomePurpose
The
analyses have clear purpose that begins with a solid introduction/thesis, and
compels the reader forward.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development
Writer
plumbs the depth of the ethical dilemmas with evident granular detail. Team
input and course materials are leveraged powerfully and with reflective
detail.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, StyleDescription
of criterion
Grammar
refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and
use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage,
e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style refers to
dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows,
describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in
composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with
meaning.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides
|
|
20.0 pts
|
||
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
|
|
15.0 pts
|
||
|
Total
Points: 125.0
|
||||
Comments
Post a Comment