MODULE 5: STRIKE REPLACEMENTS How do you feel about strike replacements?


Visit Below Link, To Download This Course:
http://bit.ly/2LDsfoB

DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Labor Disputes and Grivance Latest

DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Discussion

MODULE 5: STRIKE REPLACEMENTS
How do you feel about strike replacements? Why is the use of them such a controversial issue in labor relations. Should the NLRA be revised to prohibit the use of temporary or permanent strike replacements?

DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Assignment

MODULE 5: YOU DECIDE ACTIVITY
There is a written assignment due this week—You Decide. You have three areas of focus for this assignment.
  1. As an attorney for Bainbridge Borough, develop a case to support the council’s rejection of Carol Fern’s unpaid maternity leave request.
  2. As an attorney for AFSCME Local 10, develop an argument to support your client’s contention that the council’s rejection of Carol’s unpaid maternity leave request violated the collective bargaining agreement.
  3. As an arbitrator, how would you rule? Why?
Write a two- to three-page paper, (double-spaced, 12 point type, APA style) that outlines the case for Bainbridge Borough, the case for AFSCME Local 10, and how you would rule as an arbitrator based on the facts you have for this case.
Submit your assignment.

RUBRIC
HRM 330 You Decide Rubric
HRM 330 You Decide Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBainbridge Rejection
Based on the collective bargaining agreement wording, defend why Carol’s request should be denied.
40.0 pts
Full Marks
32.0 pts
Mid Marks
24.0 pts
Low Marks
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnion’s Contention
Based on the collective bargaining agreement, defend why Carol’s request should be granted.
40.0 pts
Full Marks
32.0 pts
Mid Marks
24.0 pts
Low Marks
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArbitrator’s Perspective
Present the issues that the arbitrator has to analyze in making a decision on the grievance.
60.0 pts
Full Marks
48.0 pts
Mid Marks
36.0 pts
Low Marks
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
You have thoroughly presented both sides of the argument and have shown the arbitrator’s rationale in the decision to sustain or deny the grievance.
10.0 pts
Full Marks
8.0 pts
Medium Quality
6.0 pts
Low Quality
10.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0




Comments

Popular Posts