NU673-7D Unit 15 Discussion – Suicide Risk Herzing
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
https://www.coursetutor.us/product/nu673-7d-unit-15-discussion-suicide-risk-herzing/
.webp)
NU673-7D Unit 15 Discussion – Suicide Risk Herzing
Discussion Prompt
Ms.
Smith is a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner working in an
outpatient psychiatric clinic. She is seeing Dale Knox, a 32-years
old man for a psychiatric evaluation for the first time. Dale is
currently separated from his wife, Sofie. Dale and Sodie have
been married for 9 years. Dale has fully completed all of
his pre-evaluation paperwork and he has signed the consent for
treatment. During the psychiatric evaluation,
Ms. Smith observes that Dale is distraught, tearful and
verbalizing feelings of worthlessness and no motivation for life in
general. He states directly that he is going to kill his wife and
then kill himself tonight when she returns home from work
because he can’t stand the thought of being divorced and he knows
she is preparing to leave him. Mr. Knox states he has a handgun in
his car and has bought additional ammunition.
Answer the
following questions based on the case presentation:
- Discuss the importance of informed consent in psychiatric-mental
health treatment.
- Would Mr. Knox meet the criteria for involuntary
commitment, explain why or why not, and then discuss the involuntary
commitment process for your state and if PMHNP is able to involuntarily
commit a patient the state where you practice?
- Should the PMHNP notify Mrs. Knox about her husband’s
threat to kill her, or should the PMHNP protect the confidentiality of
Mr. Knox treatment?
- What additional resources should you consider in this case for help
for the patient and his family?
- What is the prevalence of suicide-related to someone
who has a plan and the means? Are there any other criteria that this
patient meets that places him in a higher risk category for carrying out
suicide?
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate
critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to
support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text
citations and corresponding references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts with substantive
comments using the following steps:
- Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow
students with information that will enhance the learning environment.
- References and citations should conform to APA standards.
- Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if their
views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.
- Plagiarism is never acceptable – give credit when
credit is due – cite your sources.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate
critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to
support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text
citations and corresponding references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the
criteria. Collaboration points will be forfeited if you fail to meet the
response post guidelines.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
Comments
Post a Comment