This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
PSY-362-O501 Topic 2 CLC Ethics and IRB GCU
Just Click on Below Link To Download
This Course:
PSY-362-O501 Topic 2 CLC Ethics and IRB GCU
This is a Collaborative Learning Community
(CLC) assignment. You will be assigned group in class.
We have navigated through much research to
date. As you know, ethical considerations are vital during this
process. After reading about Milgram’s compliance
experiment and many of the early studies in social
psychology, it becomes clear that participants in social
psychology have suffered harm. There are safeguards
in place today within the American Psychological
Association’s Code of Ethics (2016) with regard to research.
Institutional Review Boards have also been put in place
to protect both human and animal research
participants.
Imagine your CLC group sits on an Institutional Review
Board (IRB) and someone like Phillip Zombardo or
Stanley Milgram provides you with a research proposal to
conduct the same experiment(s).
Task: Do some research and chose an unethical study that
has been conducted thus far (i.e., Monster Study,
Aversion Project, Dr. Money/David Reimer, Learned
Helplessness).A quick Internet search will reveal other
ideas.
Your job is to approve the study, approve
with modifications, or reject the study completely. Using the APA Code of
Ethics, justify your group’s determination. The code of ethics can be found at
http://www.apa.org/
ethics/code/index.aspx
Create a PowerPoint presentation, of 8-12
slides (slide count does not include the title and reference slide), in
which your group presents their decision. Your
PowerPoint should include:
1. Provide a summary of the experiment.
2. Identify some general ethical concerns with the experiment.
3. Using the APA Code of Ethics, identify at least five
specific ethic codes that were violated with this study. Be
sure to explain why there was a code violation.
4. Provide your decision as an IRB if you will approve
the study, approve it with modifications, or flat out reject
it all together.
Use two to three scholarly resources for support. Your
textbook is a viable source. Resources should be listed
on the last slide.
Include speaker notes below each
content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the
presentation in person. Expand upon the information
included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please
ensure the speaker notes include 50-75 words per slide.
NOTE: Save and upload your PowerPoint
as a PDF if it’s too large.
While APA style is not required for the body
of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and
documentation of sources should be presented using APA
formatting guidelines, including an APA formatted
reference slide, which can be found in the APA Style
Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to
LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is
located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Comments
Post a Comment