ECS 590 Topic 5 Benchmark Small Group GCU
ECS 590 Topic 5 Benchmark Small Group GCU
Just Click on Below Link To Download
This Course:
https://cutt.ly/59PbFKZ
Part 1: Pre-Assessment Using Non-Standardized Assessments
Begin this assignment by pre-assessing a small group
of students as a continuation of your clinical field experience in Topic 4. In
this field experience, you were asked to select a developmentally appropriate
and engaging technology-based assessment that was implemented with your
identified small group. After assessing the children, write a 250-500 word
summary of the experience. Describe the academic area you assessed, the
assessment tool used, the results of the pre-assessment, and your
considerations regarding differentiation (why you did or did not differentiate
the assessment.) When recording the assessment results, keep the information
confidential and use pseudonyms for the students.
Part 2: Design and Deliver a Lesson
In your Topic 5 field experience you were asked to
design and deliver a lesson. Reflecting on your experience, you identified
differentiations you would make to your lesson, assessment, and/or assessment
procedures in the future. Revise and complete your lesson plan to reflect these
differentiations.
Part 3 : Analyze Post-Assessment Data and Communicate the
Assessment Results
After delivering the lesson and post-assessment, begin
analyzing the pre- and post-assessment data. Select one student with
exceptionalities to provide additional assistance at home. Write a 250-500-word
letter to send home to the family of this student that provides feedback
regarding his or her performance. This letter should include information
regarding the assessment data and suggest a research-based at-home activity
that the parents can facilitate to support their child’s development in the
domain area. In addition provide the family a rationale as to why that specific
activity is appropriate for meeting their child’s needs, including how the
activity supports the child’s transition for the next grade level.
Submit the pre-assessment summary, the revised lesson
plan, the post-assessment data, the family letter, and the rationale as one
deliverable.
While APA style format is not required for the body of
this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and
references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior
to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to
LopesWrite. Refer to the?LopesWrite
Technical Support articles?for assistance.
Program competencies and national standards assessed
in the benchmark assignment:
COE 3.9
Use data to develop and implement a variety of
education and transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a
wide range of settings and different learning experiences in collaboration with
individuals, families, and teams. [CEC 5.5; NAEYC 2c, 6b, InTASC 7(b), 7(e),
10(d), 10(m); ISTE 5c; MC 1]
COE 4.1
Examine assessments and other performance data to
develop appropriate goals, curriculum, and teaching strategies for young
children. [CEC 4.2; NAEYC 3a; InTASC 6(c), 6(g); ISTE 2d; MC 1]
COE 4.2
Use technology and other appropriate assessment tools
and approaches to observe, document, and collect data to inform practice and
decision-making. [CEC 5.2; NAEYC 3b; InTASC 6(i)]
COE 4.3
Practice responsible assessment to promote positive
outcomes for each child, providing students with multiple and varied formative
and summative assessments and using assistive technology for children with
exceptionalities when appropriate. [CEC 4.1; NAEYC 3c; InTASC 6(a), 6(b), 6(e),
6(h); ISTE 2d]
COE 4.4
Develop partnerships with families and professional
colleagues to support assessment practices, engage learners, and build
effective learning environments. [CEC 4.3; NAEYC 3d; InTASC 6(i); MC 4]
COE 4.5
Engage individuals with exceptionalities to work
toward quality learning and performance and provide data-based feedback to
guide them. [CEC 4.4; InTASC 6(d), 6(f)]
.webp)

Comments
Post a Comment