ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussions
ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussions
Just Click on Below Link To Download
This Course:
https://cutt.ly/m3wFHDt
ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussions
ENG106
ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week
7 Discussion 1
In the lecture, Rebekah
Taylor’s argument in “A Letter to Jim” follows a particular arrangement of
ideas. Your proposal should do the same thing. In other words, your proposal
should follow this outline:
- Open
cordially and introduce the issue
- Summarize
the opposing view fairly and accurately while recognizing their importance
- Summarize
your own view of the issue without arguing that the opposing views are
wrong
- Find common
ground on which to build a compromise
- Argue in
favor of a perspective that both you and your skeptical audience can agree
on
- Propose a
compromise
To what extent did you
arrange your letter to follow this organizational pattern? To what extent does
it deviate from this organizational pattern? How do you plan to fix the pattern
of arrangement in your letter?
ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week
7 Discussion 2
In the lecture, we
discussed how the Rogerian style of argument requires a conciliatory style. How
does Rebekah Taylor show Jim that she means no harm and that she does not wish
to pursue a heated debate? How well does your own letter follow Rebekah
Taylor’s example? What did you do well? How could you improve? Provide some
examples.
During the week, respond
to your classmates’ posts and comment on their use of a conciliatory style.
Comments
Post a Comment