NU671 Unit 6 Discussion – Evidence-Based Practice Herzing
NU671 Unit 6 Discussion – Evidence-Based Practice Herzing
Just Click on Below Link To Download
This Course:
https://herzingtutorials.com/tutorials/nu671-unit-6-discussion-evidence-based-practice-herzing/
Discussion: Unit 6, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Evidence-Based Practice
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in
the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word
requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with
peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt
elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response
carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless
specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of
one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites
must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA
format.
Classroom Participation:
Students are expected to address the initial discussion question
by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a
minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and
posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add
something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s),
you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer
information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience
is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however, should be correlated to
the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criteria inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing, and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion or the initial discussion is late, you
will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your
peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Discussion Question/Prompt [Due Wednesday]
Consider the following questions in your initial discussion
post:
·
Review the partial SOAP note accessed through this link.
o EBP SOAP Note[Word Doc]
Initial Post
Post a discussion constructed as the ‘P’ (treatment plan) that
completes the partial SOAP note accessed through the link above.
Include in the discussion:
1.
1.
Your treatment “Plan” for the first two diagnoses (see note below on how to structure the ‘P’)
2.
Citations for each of the evidence-based practice (EBP)
interventions included in your Plan
3.
For each article you cited in support of an element of the Plan,
provide your thoughts about the strength of the evidence presented in the
article(s)
Plan
(P):
These are the interventions that relate to each individual,
numbered diagnosis.
Document
individual plans directly after each corresponding assessment (Ex. Assessment Plan).
Address the following aspects (they should be separated out as listed below):
Diagnostics: labs, diagnostics
testing – tests that you planned for/ordered during the encounter that you plan
to review/evaluate relative to your workup for the patient’s chief complaint
Therapeutic: changes in meds,
skincare, counseling, include full prescribing information for any
pharmacologic interventions including quantity and number of refills for any
new or refilled medications.
Educational: information clients
need in order to address their health problems. Include follow up care.
Anticipatory guidance and counseling.
Consultation/Collaboration: referrals or consult
while in clinic with another provider. If no referral made was there a possible
referral you could make and why? Advance care planning.
NOTE: please input N/A where
appropriate for the above 4 categories, do not assume that your clinical
faculty person will know it was not applicable.
Responses need to address all components of the question,
demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer-reviewed journal
evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text
citations and corresponding references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the
criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]
Please respond to at least 2 of
your peer’s posts with substantive comments using the following steps:
·
Construct a response – ideally one who utilized the same EBP
interventions that you did and one who did not.
o Substantive comments add to
the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will
enhance the learning environment.
o References and citations
should conform to APA standards.
o Remember: Please respect the
opinions of others, even if their views differ. In other words, disagree
professionally and respectfully.
o Plagiarism is never
acceptable – give credit when credit is due – cite your sources.
Responses need to address all components of the question,
demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal
evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text
citations and corresponding references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the
criteria. Collaboration points will be forfeited if you fail to meet the
response post guidelines.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with
citations and references in APA format where appropriate.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
Comments
Post a Comment